Original practice question
Some people think a single global culture is replacing local traditions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
- 1
Position
Disagree that replacement is the general rule. A layer of shared products sits on top of habits that still organise family life, and the layer is mistaken for the whole because it is what a visitor can see.
- 2
Body paragraph 1
- Point
- Clothes, coffee and a chart song can be the same in two cities while the wedding, the funeral and the weekly meal are not.
- Explanation
- The visible layer travels because it is sold. The practices that decide who cooks, who inherits, and which day the family must gather do not travel as a download. Calling the layer a single culture confuses a shop window with a household.
- Example
- Two cousins in different countries wearing the same trainers and still keeping different rules about who may speak at a funeral.
- 3
Body paragraph 2
- Point
- Some local practices do shrink when the shared layer takes the only free evening and the only shop.
- Explanation
- The claim of replacement is not always fantasy. A language not used at work, a recipe not sold at the nearest shop, a festival that loses its day to a global sale: those are real losses. They are specific. They are not proof that one culture has finished the job.
- Example
- A midweek market of regional food that emptied after the late shift and a chain supermarket took the same hour.
- 4
Conclusion
A shared surface is not a single culture. Worry about the particular practice that lost its hour, not about a replacement that a pair of trainers seems to prove.