Original practice question
Some people believe that university education should be free for every student who is offered a place. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
- 1
Position
Partly agree: a place should not depend on family income, but a completely open cheque without any academic condition wastes places on students who will not use them.
- 2
Body paragraph 1
- Point
- Fees that rise faster than wages push capable students out of degrees the public later needs.
- Explanation
- The student who leaves is often not the weakest. It is the one whose family cannot carry unpaid placements on top of tuition, so nursing, teaching and engineering lose people who had already met the entry standard.
- Example
- A student offered a nursing place in a city where hospital placements are unpaid and the rent on a shared room is higher than a part-time wage.
- 3
Body paragraph 2
- Point
- Free tuition with no selection fills lecture halls and thins the teaching each student actually receives.
- Explanation
- A seminar of twelve can have its weekly problem class cut when enrolment doubles and the budget does not. "Free for everyone who applies" is a different policy from "free for everyone offered a place".
- Example
- A first-year engineering course that dropped weekly tutorials after the department was told to accept every applicant.
- 4
Conclusion
Keep the offer selective, and fund grants or fee caps for students who could not otherwise take the place they have already earned.