Skip to content

IELTS Writing Task 2 Work Essay Topics

Work questions in Task 2 look broad and then punish a broad answer. "Jobs are important" does not respond to a prompt about short-term contracts, and a paragraph about robots does not respond to a prompt about the retirement age. The instruction picks the job.

  • 8 practice questions
  • 6 question types
  • Original questions
Inside this topic
  • Home working
  • Contracts
  • Internships

Before you pick a question

How this topic works

Read it before you decide whether you are weighing two views, judging a trend, or pairing a cause with a measure.

  1. 01

    The useful detail in a work essay is the contract, the hour, and who bears the risk

    The useful detail in a work essay is the contract, the hour, and who bears the risk. A permanent post spreads sickness and a quiet month across the employer. A three-month contract hands that month to the worker. Working from home saves a commute and also hides whether a junior is learning or only answering messages. A higher retirement age is a different claim from "people live longer": it is a claim about knees, pensions, and a job that cannot be done at the same pace at sixty-seven. Name those, and the argument starts to be about work rather than about society in general.

  2. 02

    Do not invent unemployment rates or the name of a labour law

    Do not invent unemployment rates or the name of a labour law. If you are not sure of the figure, describe the mechanism a reader can recognise: a rota, a payslip, a supervisor who can see the work, a client who cannot. Personal stories help only when the point survives without the reader knowing your uncle. "My uncle prefers the office" is an anecdote. "A new hire who never hears how a senior phrases a difficult email learns the task and not the judgement" is an argument.

  3. 03

    These eight questions are original

    These eight questions are original. They are not remembered exam items. The outlines stay closed until you open them, so you can attempt a position first. The vocabulary is tied to the ideas on this page. A phrase about internships will not rescue an essay about machines, and a phrase about machines will make a retirement essay sound as if you changed topic halfway through.

A question sheet with the instruction line highlightedQtype

8 original practice questions

Practice questions

Showing 8 of 8 questions

Opinion01

Original practice question

Some people think employees should be allowed to work from home on a permanent basis. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Start writing
Discussion02

Original practice question

Some people believe a high salary is the most important part of a job. Others believe that satisfaction with the work matters more. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Start writing
Advantages and disadvantages03

Original practice question

Many companies now use short-term contracts instead of permanent jobs. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this for workers?

Start writing
Problem and solution04

Original practice question

In some countries, people are working longer hours than they did a generation ago. What problems does this cause, and what measures can be taken to deal with them?

Start writing
Two-part question05

Original practice question

More people are changing careers in their thirties and forties. Why do they do this? Do you think this is a good thing for employers?

Start writing
Positive or negative development06

Original practice question

Many jobs that existed twenty years ago have been replaced by machines. Is this a positive or negative development?

Start writing
Opinion07

Original practice question

Some people think the retirement age should be raised because people are living longer. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Start writing
Problem and solution08

Original practice question

A growing number of graduates take unpaid internships in order to enter a profession. What are the reasons for this, and what can be done to make entry fairer?

Start writing

6 question types on this topic

Question types

The work questions above use these instructions. The guide names the paragraph jobs. You still choose the arguments.

Both sides of the debate

Common arguments

In favour

4 arguments
  1. 1

    Secure work is not a nostalgic preference. It is what lets an adult sign a tenancy, book a dentist, and tell a supervisor that a rota is unsafe. A permanent contract does those things because the next month’s wage is not a negotiation. Arguments in favour of security are often dismissed as fear of change. They are arguments about which risks a person can carry. A firm can spread a quiet month across its accounts. A single worker cannot spread it across anything except rent they still owe.

  2. 2

    Pay is a clearer signal than praise. A job can be called a family, a mission, or a passion, and still pay less than the bus fare to get there. The case for taking salary seriously is that money is the part of the deal an outsider can check. Satisfaction matters, and it matters more once the wage covers a modest life. Before that line, telling people to follow their interest is advice from someone whose interest is already funded.

  3. 3

    Some work should be shortened or handed to a machine because a person doing it for thirty years is the expensive option in injuries. Night lifting, repetitive sorting, and watching a gauge that rarely moves are not character-building. They are a design that treated a human as a cheap component. Replacing that component is a gain if the person is moved to the judgement the machine cannot make: the damaged parcel, the unusual patient, the exception.

  4. 4

    Mid-career change is evidence that people learn what they can stand. A job chosen at eighteen was often a guess. By forty the person has a record of real tasks and a clearer sense of which Tuesday they dread. Employers who hire that record, instead of only hiring potential, get someone who has already managed a shift, a class, or a client. The case for welcoming career changes is a case about information: the older applicant simply has more of it.

Against

4 arguments
  1. 1

    Flexibility is often the employer’s flexibility renamed as a benefit. A contract that can end on Friday, hours that move by text the night before, and "work from anywhere" that means "answer at 10 p.m." shift cost onto the worker while the brochure uses the worker’s language of freedom. The sceptical line is worth writing without sneering: ask who chooses the hour, who is paid if the hour runs long, and who is at fault if the child is not collected. If the answer is always the worker, the arrangement is not flexible. It is casual.

  2. 2

    Long hours are a management failure more often than a personal virtue. A team that stays late every Thursday is usually covering a vacancy, a client promise nobody scoped, or a manager who equates presence with loyalty. Praising the staying makes the vacancy permanent. The argument against longer hours is not that hard work is shameful. It is that unpaid extra time hides how many people the job actually needs, so the firm never hires them.

  3. 3

    Raising the retirement age as a single national number pretends that bodies age on the same schedule as spreadsheets. They do not. A policy written from the life expectancy of professional workers and then applied to porters, cooks and drivers saves the pension on paper and disables people in practice. Opposition to a blanket rise is not opposition to anyone working longer. It is opposition to one threshold for a warehouse and an office.

  4. 4

    Unpaid and barely paid entry routes do not select the most able. They select the most subsidised. A profession that claims to hire on merit while requiring three months without wages has substituted parental housing for a test. The argument against internships of that kind is an argument about the sample of people who get through, not about whether a trial task is useful. A paid trial would still be a trial. It would just stop charging admission.

16 phrases for these ideas

Vocabulary in context

PhraseIn a sentence
a permanent contractA permanent contract meant she could name the next month’s rent, which the twelve-week renewal never allowed.
a short-term contractThe short-term contract suited a product launch with a real end date, and it was a poor fit for a reception desk that never closed.
overtimeOvertime that was not written on the rota still kept him in the building, so the official hours were a fiction.
a commuteThe commute added two hours in which no work was done, which is why experienced staff wanted those hours back.
a junior member of staffA junior member of staff can follow the handbook and still miss the tone in which bad news is usually given.
job satisfactionJob satisfaction mattered once the wage covered childcare. Below that line it was a luxury word.
the retirement ageRaising the retirement age by one number ignored the porter whose back had already failed the handling test.
a pensionThe pension was affordable only if heavy jobs could stop earlier than desk jobs, rather than on the same birthday.
an unpaid internshipAn unpaid internship in the capital filtered out every graduate who could not borrow a spare room.
a payslipThe payslip showed the contracted hours and not the evening round, so the long day was invisible to anyone auditing the firm.
shift workShift work that moved by a text the night before made a regular bedtime for the children impossible to promise.
to be made redundantShe was made redundant when the ordering software arrived, and the firm offered a data course only to staff under thirty.
a career changeThe career change at forty looked sudden, but the original ladder had already been removed by the software.
manual workManual work could not be extended to sixty-eight just because office staff in the same pension scheme were living longer.
a zero-hours arrangementA zero-hours arrangement left the quiet weeks unpaid, which is the opposite of sharing the firm’s risk.
on-the-job trainingOn-the-job training disappeared when the senior people were at home and the junior was left with a chat window.

Marked in red pen

A teaching paragraph

One paragraph written to the question below. It shows how a point, an explanation and an example can sit in the same paragraph. It is not an essay.

The question

Many companies now use short-term contracts instead of permanent jobs. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this for workers?

A short contract is a fair instrument when the work itself has an ending, and a way of shifting risk when it does not. A tester hired for a four-month software release can work intensely, be paid for those months, and leave without pretending the post was a career. The end date is an advantage because it is true. The same paperwork, applied to a receptionist renewed every twelve weeks for three years, does something else. She cannot show a landlord a stable line, and she will not report a fault in week ten if week eleven might be silent. The firm has kept an ordinary, ongoing job and deleted the month in which a quiet period would have been the firm’s problem. For workers, the form is only as good as the task it is tied to.

Why this works

The paragraph takes the advantages-and-disadvantages job literally: one case where the end date is honest, one where it is a disguise, and a last sentence that says how to tell them apart. The receptionist is not a sob story. She shows the disadvantage as a tenancy form and a safety report that does not get written. Nothing here promises a band. It shows how one paragraph can hold both sides without a list of three advantages and three disadvantages, which is how this question type usually runs out of time.

Questions about work

No. Work is a topic, not a type. A question about salary versus satisfaction asks you to discuss both views. A question about machines replacing jobs asks you to judge a development. A question about longer hours asks for problems and measures. If you write a single "I disagree" shape under all of them, two of the three tasks are missed.

Only if you can describe the mechanism without relying on the reader knowing that law. A named act you half remember is weaker than a clear account of who records the hours and who pays the overtime. Markers are not testing civics. They are testing whether your reason matches the question.

Two developed reasons beat five named ones. For a problem question, one cause and one measure that actually answers it is a complete pair. A list of "stress, health and family" without showing how the rota produces them reads as a brainstorm you did not have time to explain.

Yes, if a stranger can see the point without your biography. "I like my team" does not travel. "The evening round was added by text, so the school meeting disappeared" does. Keep the example inside one paragraph and make sure it serves the reason you have already stated.

Write the essay on the question you chose

Aim for Band 7+. Treat the Grade Report as practice.

Task 2 checker