Skip to content

IELTS Writing Task 2 Government and society Essay Topics

Government essays fail when they praise "society" and never name a budget line. The examiner is not asking whether public life is valuable. The instruction is about a choice: a pound spent on a clinic versus a pound spent attracting a factory, a fine for not voting versus a right to stay at home, a payment sent to every adult versus a payment sent only to people who apply.

  • 6 practice questions
  • 6 question types
  • Original questions
Inside this topic
  • Voting
  • Basic income
  • Public services

Before you pick a question

How this topic works

If the paragraph would still make sense with the ministry rubbed out, it is not yet about government.

  1. 01

    Write the mechanism and the person who meets it

    Write the mechanism and the person who meets it. A basic income is not "support". It is a sum that arrives whether or not the recipient filled in a form, and it has to be paid for by a tax, a cut, or both. Compulsory voting is not "more democracy" by itself. It is a ballot paper that an annoyed person may spoil, plus a clerk who has to record the fine. Publishing a high earner's tax record is not transparency in the abstract. It is a neighbour who can now look up a surgeon's income, and a surgeon who may move the income somewhere the list does not reach.

  2. 02

    Do not invent a constitution, a turnout figure, or the name of an act

    Do not invent a constitution, a turnout figure, or the name of an act. If you are not sure of the rule, describe the desk it creates: a form, a threshold, a payment date, an appeal. Those travel from one country to another. A story about your own council does not, unless the point is visible to a reader who has never lived on your street.

  3. 03

    These six questions are original practice

    These six questions are original practice. They are not remembered papers. Open an outline when the shape will not come, not when you want a position to copy. The vocabulary belongs to the ideas on this page. A phrase about a ballot paper will not rescue an essay about museum funding, and a phrase about tax will make a voting essay sound as if you changed country halfway through.

A question sheet with the instruction line highlightedQtype

6 original practice questions

Practice questions

Showing 6 of 6 questions

Opinion01

Original practice question

Some people think governments should spend more on public services than on attracting private investment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Start writing
Discussion02

Original practice question

Some people think voting in national elections should be compulsory. Others think citizens should be free not to vote. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Start writing
Advantages and disadvantages03

Original practice question

What are the advantages and disadvantages of a government paying a basic income to every adult citizen?

Start writing
Problem and solution04

Original practice question

Many people feel that national politics has little effect on their daily lives. What are the causes of this problem, and what solutions can you suggest?

Start writing
Two-part question05

Original practice question

In some countries, fewer young adults join political parties. Why is this happening? What can schools do to help?

Start writing
Positive or negative development06

Original practice question

Some governments now publish the personal tax records of high earners. Is this a positive or a negative development?

Start writing

6 question types on this topic

Question types

The government and society questions above use these instructions. The guide names the paragraph jobs. You still choose the arguments.

  • Opinion

    “To what extent do you agree?”

    1 question on this page

  • Discussion

    “Discuss both views”

    1 question on this page

  • Advantages and disadvantages

    “Do the advantages outweigh…?”

    1 question on this page

  • Problem and solution

    “What are the causes? What can be done?”

    1 question on this page

  • Two-part question

    “Two direct questions: answer both”

    1 question on this page

  • Positive or negative development

    “Is this positive or negative?”

    1 question on this page

    A government and society prompt that only asks whether a change is positive or negative has no guide of its own. Paste the question on the question types page for a paragraph plan.

  • All question types

Both sides of the debate

Common arguments

In favour

4 arguments
  1. 1

    A government is the only body that can buy some things once, for everyone, without checking each person’s wallet at the door. Street lighting, a vaccination session, a court that will hear a tenant: these collapse if they are sold ticket by ticket. The case for public spending is not that ministers are wise. It is that a shared cost is sometimes the only way the thing exists on a street where most people could not order it alone. When that spending is cut, the cost reappears as a private bill for those who can pay and as an absence for those who cannot.

  2. 2

    Rules that apply to strangers need a writer who is not one of the strangers in the deal. A landlord and a tenant do not negotiate as equals if the tenant is a week from the street. A minimum standard for the room, set outside that conversation, is the government’s dull job. Arguments for regulation are arguments about the moment when one side can walk away and the other cannot. Leave that moment to "the market" and you have described the tenant’s lack of choice as if it were a preference.

  3. 3

    Elections are a crude way of removing people from power without a fight. That is a smaller claim than "voting solves public problems", and it is the claim worth defending. A government that can be turned out on a Thursday has a reason to fear the bus fare and the waiting list. A government that cannot be turned out has a reason to fear the people in the room. The case for taking the ballot seriously is a case about replacement, not about the magic of a cross on a paper.

  4. 4

    Tax is the price of the things the first paragraphs named, and it is also a record of who was asked to pay. A system that can show its rates, its reliefs and its actual receipts can be argued with. A system that hides them can only be believed or disbelieved. Publishing the rules, and checking that the receipts match the rules, is a public good even for people who want the rates to be lower. You cannot oppose a number you are not allowed to see.

Against

4 arguments
  1. 1

    Governments spend other people’s money through offices that do not feel the mistake. A grant programme written in the capital can fund a project the town did not ask for, then call the underspend a success because the form was complete. The sceptical case is not that every public pound is wasted. It is that the feedback is slow. A shop that sells a bad meal hears about it by Friday. A scheme that trains nobody for a job that exists can run for years if the metric is "places filled".

  2. 2

    Compulsion and universal schemes often punish the person they were drawn to help, because the office administering them needs a simple rule. A fine for not voting hits the worker who could not leave the shift. A basic income paid to everyone is simple, and the simplicity is why it also pays the person who needed a nurse instead of a cheque. Opposition to neat national programmes is often opposition to a rule that cannot see the case in front of it.

  3. 3

    Public debate is not improved by more information of every kind. A register of high earners’ names feeds envy and threat more reliably than it feeds a tax reform. A consultation with forty questions and a two-week window is a document, not a conversation. The case against "more transparency" and "more engagement" as slogans is that both can be designed to exhaust people. Ask what decision the extra fact changes, and who has the hours to read it.

  4. 4

    Parties and ministries are careers. A young person who stays out of a branch meeting may have noticed that the meeting is about posts inside the meeting. Treating that refusal as ignorance flatters the institution. The argument against scolding the public for apathy is that apathy is sometimes a reading of the incentives: the speech is national, the effect is local, and nobody publishes the link. Until that link is ordinary, lectures about civic duty are advertising for the people already in the room.

15 phrases for these ideas

Vocabulary in context

PhraseIn a sentence
a public serviceA public service such as the evening bus is either funded for the whole route or it disappears for everyone past the last profitable stop.
private investmentPrivate investment built the warehouse, and the rate discount meant the council’s income from the site did not arrive for a decade.
a tax baseThe clinic’s wages depended on a tax base of people who still worked in the town, which a single grant could not replace.
compulsory votingCompulsory voting raised the percentage and also produced papers marked in the queue by people who had not read a leaflet.
a polling stationMoving the polling station twelve miles away changed the result more quietly than any slogan did.
a spoiled ballotA spoiled ballot is a way of attending without endorsing, and a fine that ignores that distinction counts presence as support.
a basic incomeA basic income let her take two paid mornings without losing the entire sum that covered the rent.
means-testedThe means-tested benefit stopped as soon as she earned a small wage, so the short job left her worse off.
a budget lineThe speech never named the budget line, so residents could not tell whether the library hours were the thing being cut.
a turnoutA higher turnout that includes unread papers is a weaker signal than a lower one made up of people who chose to come.
a tax recordThe tax record showed the reliefs claimed, which the headline rate had hidden.
a reliefA relief written into the code lowered the cheque far below the rate announced in the budget speech.
a local councilThe local council, not the national studio, was the office that could say whether the last bus would still run.
a consultationThe consultation ran for two weeks in August, which is how a duty to ask can be met without being heard.
a mandateA mandate built on a fine is a count of attendance, not a request for the policy printed on the leaflet.

Marked in red pen

A teaching paragraph

One paragraph written to the question below. It shows how a point, an explanation and an example can sit in the same paragraph. It is not an essay.

The question

Some people think voting in national elections should be compulsory. Others think citizens should be free not to vote. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

A fine would raise the number of papers in the box, and that is the serious point in favour of compulsion. Parties that only visit streets where people already vote have no reason to learn the name of a village whose polling station moved twelve miles down the road. Forcing the village into the count might force it onto the leaflet. The same fine, though, cannot force the leaflet to be read. A worker who ticks the first name because the penalty is due on Friday has been counted, not consulted. I would rather move the station back, lengthen the hours, and make a postal vote hard to miss. Absence would then mean something. A higher percentage full of unread marks does not.

Why this works

The paragraph handles a discussion properly. The first half gives the compulsory camp a real mechanism, the moved polling station, instead of a slogan about democracy. The turn ("The same fine, though") answers that mechanism with a second one, the unread tick, so the writer’s opinion is a conclusion from the two views and not a third topic about education or tax. On the criteria, Task Response is served because both views are present and the opinion is explicit, and Coherence is served because each sentence takes the previous scene one step further rather than starting a new complaint.

Questions about government and society

An opinion question asks where you stand on one proposal, such as spending more on services than on private investment. A discussion gives you two camps, such as compulsory voting versus a right to stay home, and both camps need a paragraph before you decide. If you only attack the fine and never explain why someone wanted it, you have not discussed both views.

No. A precise false figure reads as carelessness. Describe the office the policy creates: a form, a threshold, a payment, a station that moved. A reader can judge that without a statute number. If you know a real rule and can state it accurately, use it. If you are guessing, do not.

Use a person and a cliff-edge. A carer who loses a whole benefit by earning two mornings is clearer than "the system is unfair". Name what the payment was covering, usually rent or food, and what was cut to fund it if you are arguing about cost. One household plus one budget line is enough.

No. These are practice questions. The instruction on the day may be about censorship, the arts, or the age of criminal responsibility. A stored essay on basic income will miss the task as soon as the verb changes. Practise recognising the type and building a position you can explain with a mechanism.

Write the essay on the question you chose

Aim for Band 7+. Treat the Grade Report as practice.

Task 2 checker