Skip to content

IELTS Writing Task 2 Crime Essay Topics

Crime essays slide into moral noise. Everyone in the room is already against burglary. The task is what the state does next: a cell, a community order, a power to stop a person on a pavement, a camera that keeps the tape, a meeting between the person who was harmed and the person who did it.

  • 6 practice questions
  • 6 question types
  • Original questions
Inside this topic
  • Prison
  • CCTV
  • Community sentences

Before you pick a question

How this topic works

"Crime is bad for society" answers none of those instructions.

  1. 01

    Name the hour and the record

    Name the hour and the record. Prison is a building that holds someone, at a weekly cost, and then releases them into a week with no job and the same friends. A stop-and-search power is a minute on a street corner that either finds the knife or becomes the story that person tells about the police. CCTV is a lens with a retention period. If you cannot say who watches the tape, how long it is kept, and what a false match does to the wrong pedestrian, you are writing about a feeling of safety rather than about a camera.

  2. 02

    Do not invent crime rates, sentencing guidelines, or the name of a force

    Do not invent crime rates, sentencing guidelines, or the name of a force. A mechanism is enough and safer: a lock on a door, a tag on an ankle, a shift that ends at two in the morning, a form that records why a person was stopped. Personal anecdotes only work when the reader can see the rule without knowing your street.

  3. 03

    These questions are original practice, not recycled papers

    These questions are original practice, not recycled papers. The outlines stay closed until you need the shape. Vocabulary about sentencing will sound stuffed in a paragraph about cameras, and the other way round. Stay with the institution the question actually named.

A question sheet with the instruction line highlightedQtype

6 original practice questions

Practice questions

Showing 6 of 6 questions

Opinion01

Original practice question

Some people believe that a prison sentence is the most effective way to reduce crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Start writing
Discussion02

Original practice question

Some people think the police should have wider powers to stop and search people in public. Others think those powers lead to unfair treatment. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Start writing
Advantages and disadvantages03

Original practice question

What are the advantages and disadvantages of sending young offenders to community service instead of prison?

Start writing
Problem and solution04

Original practice question

Many people who leave prison commit another offence within a short time. What are the causes of this problem, and what solutions can you suggest?

Start writing
Two-part question05

Original practice question

Cameras now record many city streets all day. Why have so many cities installed them? Do you think residents are safer as a result?

Start writing
Positive or negative development06

Original practice question

In some places, a victim of crime can meet the offender as part of the sentence. Is this a positive or a negative development?

Start writing

6 question types on this topic

Question types

The crime questions above use these instructions. The guide names the paragraph jobs. You still choose the arguments.

Both sides of the debate

Common arguments

In favour

4 arguments
  1. 1

    Punishment is a way of saying, in public, that a particular harm was not a private misfortune. A broken lock is also a message to the next house if nothing follows. The case for a visible response — a sentence people can look up, an order with hours attached — is that neighbours stop inventing their own. Vigilantism starts in the gap where the official record looks empty. A dull, predictable consequence is not cruelty. It is a substitute for the unofficial one.

  2. 2

    Restraint has a value that rehabilitation talk sometimes skips. There are weeks when the useful thing is that a person is not on a landing, not at a school gate, not able to collect a debt in person. Prison and, for lower levels, a curfew with a tag are technologies of absence. Defending them does not require a theory that suffering improves character. It requires a list of the people who are safer during the absence, and an honest end date.

  3. 3

    Records protect the innocent as well as the investigation. A written reason for a search, a tape with a deletion date, a charge sheet that names the offence: these are how a later reader tells a fair stop from a habit. The argument for more paperwork in policing is an argument for a trail. Memory is kind to the officer and thin for the person who was stopped. The form is what the complaint uses.

  4. 4

    Repair can sit inside a sentence without replacing it. Hours that put a wall back, a meeting the victim asked for, a wage arranged before release: these treat the harm as a thing in the world and not only as a moral stain. The case for those elements is practical. A painted hall is a hall. An apology performed for a discount is not repair. The difference is whether the injured person, or the broken object, is better when the order ends.

Against

4 arguments
  1. 1

    Prison is an expensive pause that concentrates people who are good at the offence. A short sentence for a non-violent theft teaches the building’s lessons — who to know, what to hide, how to treat the week after as someone else’s problem — and then returns the person to the debt. Opposition to prison as a default is not a claim that theft is trivial. It is a claim about the curriculum of the building and the bill for a place that does not change the Friday of release.

  2. 2

    Powers written for a knife expand to a mood. Stop-and-search that begins after a stabbing ends, a year later, as a way to check "people who look wrong" on an ordinary Saturday. Cameras that were going to be wiped after a month are kept because the disk is cheap. The argument against wider powers is an argument about drift. A tool with no deletion date and no tally of who it touches will be used on the easiest targets, not on the hardest offences.

  3. 3

    Public anger is a poor sentencing guideline. A horrible case makes a long tariff feel like the only respectful response, and the tariff then applies to the next, duller case that shares a legal name. Victims are not a single will. Some want a meeting. Some want never to hear the name. A system that uses "what the public feel" as the measure will be run by the loudest report of the week, and the person who wanted to be left alone will not be in it.

  4. 4

    Community sentences fail in a way that teaches the wrong lesson if they are hollow. A sheet signed in advance, a park shift nobody attends, a programme that is a video in a room: these tell the offender that the state did not mean it, and they tell the victim the same. The sceptical line is not "prison is the only real punishment". It is that an alternative has to be checked. Unchecked mercy is indistinguishable from indifference, and indifference is how people stop calling the police at all.

15 phrases for these ideas

Vocabulary in context

PhraseIn a sentence
a prison sentenceThe prison sentence kept him off that estate for four months, and it did not arrange a bed for the Friday he came out.
a repeat offenderA repeat offender who left with the same debts met the same opportunity on the first weekend.
community serviceCommunity service only counted if a named supervisor watched the hours, which the pre-signed sheet had skipped.
a young offenderA young offender painted the youth club for six weekends and kept a Saturday job that a wing would have ended.
a written reasonA written reason for the stop was the only thing the later complaint could test against the officer’s memory.
a false matchA false match on a blurry frame sent officers to the wrong flat, which the tape’s supporters had not budgeted for.
retentionRetention of a year turned a camera bought for one robbery into a file on everyone who used the corner.
a curfewA curfew with a tag kept him indoors at the hour the offence usually happened, without putting him in a dormitory.
reoffendingReoffending clustered in the first month, which is why a leaflet on the day of release arrived too late.
a hostel placeThe hostel place was not free until Monday, so the official plan and the real Friday night were different.
a charge sheetThe charge sheet named the offence in a line a neighbour could understand, which the rumour in the shop had not.
a facilitatorA facilitator stopped the meeting when the shopkeeper stood up, so the conversation stayed a choice.
remorseRemorse performed in order to shorten the tariff is a strategy, and the victim could hear the difference.
a patrolA patrol on the street that night would have seen the fight. The camera saw it afterwards.

Marked in red pen

A teaching paragraph

One paragraph written to the question below. It shows how a point, an explanation and an example can sit in the same paragraph. It is not an essay.

The question

Many people who leave prison commit another offence within a short time. What are the causes of this problem, and what solutions can you suggest?

The week after release is often the same week that led to the cell. Consider a man let out on a Friday afternoon with a hostel address that cannot take him until Monday and a carrier bag of letters from creditors. The sentence removed him from the street and also from the room and the job he had. The first person willing to offer a sofa that night is frequently the person he was sentenced for knowing. That is a cause, not a flaw in his closing speech. A workshop that becomes a paid trial the following week, with the hostel key handed over before the van leaves, aims at that Friday rather than at his character. Advice printed on a sheet does not.

Why this works

One cause is carried from the first sentence to the example, and the solution is the same scene with the bed and the shift put in place. The paragraph does not open a second problem about cameras or parenting. On the criteria, Task Response is served because a problem-and-solution instruction gets both halves, in that order, and Coherence is served because the Friday, the hostel and the key are the same objects in both halves, so the reader never has to guess what the remedy is attached to.

Questions about crime

Yes. An opinion question on prison is not a test of kindness. If you think restraint protects people during the sentence, say so, and then deal with the month after release if that is your limit. A one-sided essay that calls prison evil and never mentions the victim’s door has not answered a prompt about effectiveness.

Use a tally. Who was stopped, what was found, how long the power lasted, and whether the reason was written down. One view wants the knife found before it is used. The other view wants that search not to become a habit aimed at two postcodes. Both can be true. Your opinion should say which safeguards you would keep.

Crime rates, the name of an act, and the length of a typical sentence in a country you are guessing about. A Friday release, a tag, a camera kept for a year, a sheet signed in advance: those can be judged by common sense. A false percentage cannot.

No. A question about cameras, a question about victims meeting offenders, and a question about community hours are different jobs. These are practice questions, not a script. If you paste a prison paragraph under a prompt about CCTV, the task is missed even if the sentences are grammatical.

Write the essay on the question you chose

Aim for Band 7+. Treat the Grade Report as practice.

Task 2 checker